USC Marshall business study shows that gender stereotypes affect the perception of negotiation tactics
New research from the USC Marshall School of Business reveals that when people are trying to make a positive impression, they may behave in ways that contradict gender stereotypes, but not necessarily to their benefit. The study, carried out by Jennifer Overbeck of USC Marshall and Jared Curhan of MIT's Sloan School of Management, assigned 190 MBA students to same-sex groups to represent either a high-status recruiter or a low-status job candidate engaged in a standard employment negotiation simulation.
(Media-Newswire.com) - New research from the USC Marshall School of Business reveals that when people are trying to make a positive impression, they may behave in ways that contradict gender stereotypes, but not necessarily to their benefit.
The study, carried out by Jennifer Overbeck of USC Marshall and Jared Curhan of MIT’s Sloan School of Management, assigned 190 MBA students to same-sex groups to represent either a high-status recruiter or a low-status job candidate engaged in a standard employment negotiation simulation.
Half of the participants were offered an additional cash incentive to make a positive impression on their negotiation counterparts. Given the incentive, men and women in the high-status role acted in ways that contradicted gender stereotypes. Women negotiated more aggressively and men negotiated in a more appeasing manner.
“The findings were surprising,” said Overbeck, an assistant professor of management and organization who has taught negotiation to USC Marshall MBA students for five years. “We thought the impression motivator would intensify impression response, meaning that if you were conciliatory, you’d become more so, but being aware of making a good impression made the subjects do the opposite.”
In the study, women who were motivated to make a positive impression, perhaps in an effort to refute the stereotype that they are weak or ineffective negotiators, advocated more strongly for their own interests. In contrast, men who were motivated to make a positive impression, perhaps in an effort to refute the stereotype that they are overly aggressive, yielded to the demands of the other side.
While the men’s strategy of behaving in a more conciliatory fashion apparently succeeded in producing a positive impression in the counterparts’ eyes, the women’s strategy of behaving more assertively failed to create a more positive impression. Instead, women who behaved more assertively were judged more negatively.
“Men who try to make a positive impression by being conciliatory risk forfeiting their own economic outcomes and women who try to make positive impressions by being assertive can risk damaging their relationships,” Overbeck said.
“One implication of the study is that people have a menu of options when it comes to negotiating behavior and they need to choose strategically. If you are establishing a new relationship, you can take a hit financially; when the economic outcome is more important and the relationship isn’t needed or already established, more aggressive tactics can be pulled out from time to time,” she explained.
“Our recommendation is that the more negotiators of both sexes are conscious of dynamics affecting negotiation, the more planning or practicing they can and should do.”
The study was published in the journal Negotiation and Conflict Management Research
Related Content
Release Date
This story was released on 2008-09-05. Please make sure to visit the official company or organization web site to learn more about the original release date. See our disclaimer for additional information.
